To get a better browsing experience, please use Google Chrome.Download Chrome
Free TrialAsk for Price
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Customers
  • Blog
  • API Documentation
  • About Us
  • Demo
    NEW

< BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Trust and Safety Solutions Which Option Fits Your Business

Trust and Safety Solutions Which Option Fits Your Business

Selecting the right Trust and Safety solution challenges every business. Each industry faces unique threats, from payment fraud to evolving technology risks. Many organizations now adopt Zero Trust principles, with 63% reporting partial or full implementation globally, as shown below.

Metric/Industry Segment

Percentage/Share

Organizations with partial/full Zero Trust

63%

Large enterprises adopting Zero Trust

43%

Large enterprises moving to Zero Trust

46%

Organizations without Zero Trust

11%

Business size, sector, and risk profile shape these decisions. Companies must weigh issues like content moderation, privacy, and user trust. Reflecting on these challenges helps leaders find the best fit for their needs.

Trust and Safety Overview

Trust and Safety Overview

What It Is

Trust and Safety solutions protect digital platforms and their users from harm. These solutions combine policies, technology, and human expertise to create safe online environments. Core components include:

  • Policy and regulation: Clear guidelines for user behavior.
  • Risk assessment: Identifying threats specific to the platform.
  • Prevention and shielding: Stopping harm before it happens.
  • Detection and enforcement: Finding and addressing harmful actions.
  • Education and advocacy: Teaching users and stakeholders about safety.

Trust and Safety teams often work across departments, such as product, engineering, and leadership. They build systems that prevent abuse, fraud, and misinformation. Strong leadership and clear policies help these teams connect their work to business goals.

Why It Matters

Trust and Safety efforts protect users from abuse and misuse. These solutions help companies follow laws and build trust with their communities. A strong Trust and Safety program increases user engagement and retention. It also improves brand reputation and supports revenue growth. Teams must stay alert to new risks, such as AI-generated threats and changing regulations. Companies that invest in these solutions see better user safety and business outcomes.

Trust and Safety vs. Content Moderation

Aspect

Traditional Content Moderation

Trust & Safety Solutions

Efficiency

Focuses on speed and cost, often using many tools.

Enables faster policy updates and reduces workload.

Accuracy

Relies on manual review and limited signals.

Uses advanced routing and improves policy enforcement.

Completeness

Detects content issues but may miss context.

Ensures all actions and communications are complete.

Confidence

Offers basic security.

Supports compliance and builds trust in data.

Traditional content moderation removes harmful content based on set rules. This approach often misses complex behaviors and new threats. Trust and Safety solutions go further. They look at user behavior, detect fraud, and manage risks across the platform. These solutions combine automation with human review, making them more effective against evolving online harms.

Key Comparison Factors

Key Comparison Factors

Features

Selecting the right Trust and Safety solution starts with a close look at features. Businesses should compare solutions based on how well they address core needs such as efficiency, accuracy, completeness, and confidence. The table below highlights the most critical feature categories and their importance:

Feature Category

Description and Importance

Build vs. Buy Decision

Weighs in-house development against outsourcing for cost, control, and scalability. Hybrid models offer balance.

Safety by Design

Embeds safety into product architecture for compliance and proactive protection.

Risk Mapping

Identifies risks unique to the platform, industry, and audience for tailored policies.

Policy Development

Crafts clear, enforceable rules that adapt to new threats.

Content Moderation

Uses automation and human review to manage user content and respond to new abuse tactics.

Escalation Management

Sets up incident response plans for swift action, including legal escalation if needed.

Data Security and Compliance

Protects user data with encryption and meets regulations like GDPR and CCPA.

Transparency and Reporting

Communicates policies and moderation actions clearly to build trust and meet legal needs.

Proactive vs. Reactive

Balances harm prevention with responsive moderation based on user reports.

Technology (AI & Automation)

Leverages AI for scalable moderation, with human oversight for complex cases.

Integration and Customization

Ensures compatibility with existing systems and allows for business-specific adjustments.

Scalability and Cost-Quality

Grows with the business and balances cost with quality for sustainability.

Trust and Safety platforms adapt to nearly any business. They streamline processes, support data-driven decisions, and scale as the company grows. Customization options allow businesses to compartmentalize sensitive areas and address unique risks.

Deployment

Deployment models shape how Trust and Safety solutions perform and scale. Companies can choose from public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, or on-premises models. Each option offers different benefits and challenges:

Deployment Model

Scalability

Security & Control

Cost

Suitability for Trust and Safety Solutions

Public Cloud

High; flexible for variable workloads

Lower; needs strong controls for sensitive data

Cost-effective; pay-as-you-go

Good for scalability and flexibility, less ideal for sensitive data

Private Cloud

Moderate; limited by dedicated resources

High; better compliance and control

Higher upfront and maintenance costs

Best for compliance and data protection, less scalable

Hybrid Cloud

High; combines public and private strengths

Balanced; sensitive data stays private

Cost-effective; pay for usage

Ideal for balancing scalability, security, and cost

On-Premises

Limited; hardware upgrades needed

Maximum; best for sensitive data

High upfront and ongoing costs

Best for organizations needing full control and security

Hybrid models often provide the best balance for Trust and Safety needs. They allow sensitive data to remain secure while supporting growth and flexibility.

Support

Support services play a key role in the success of Trust and Safety solutions. Leading providers offer a range of support types that directly impact business outcomes:

Support Type

Description

Business Outcome Impact

Specialized Fraud Intelligence

Customizable rules and intelligence to protect transactions

Reduces fraud losses, protects revenue

API-first Infrastructure

Streamlines workflows and reduces payment errors

Improves efficiency and developer experience

Validation Services

Verifies accounts, businesses, and documents

Enhances platform integrity and compliance

Payment Control Center

Custom fraud rules based on business risk

Early risk identification, reduces errors

Secure Payments

Screens for beneficiary risk and sanctions

Minimizes friction, builds trust

Providers also combine technology with human expertise. Human-in-the-loop enforcement ensures AI systems remain safe and accurate. Wellness programs for moderators improve team resilience and reduce turnover. Regulatory consulting and intelligence-driven insights help businesses stay compliant and ahead of new threats.

Tip: Strong support services not only protect users but also improve customer loyalty and brand reputation.

Pricing

Pricing for Trust and Safety solutions varies widely. Vendors often tailor pricing to the business’s size, industry, and specific needs. Common pricing models include per-interaction fees, monthly subscriptions, and custom enterprise quotes. For example, some providers charge per transaction, while others offer bundled discounts for multiple services. Pricing tiers may start as low as $0.07 per transaction for basic plans, with advanced plans starting at $1,000 per month and enterprise pricing available upon consultation.

Factors that influence cost include deployment type, user count, customization level, and support requirements. Transparent pricing helps businesses budget, but some vendors require direct consultation for a quote. Companies should compare not just the sticker price but also the value delivered at each tier.

ROI

Businesses should collect data on these metrics early. Tracking safety-related tickets, compliance costs, and customer trust helps target investments and avoid costly mistakes. A rise in customer trust and a drop in safety incidents signal strong ROI.

Industry Fit

Industry fit determines how well a Trust and Safety solution meets a business’s unique needs. Policymaking must balance universal standards with industry-specific requirements. For example:

  • Each industry faces unique risks, such as illegal content in media, user vulnerabilities in healthcare, or fraud in banking.
  • Regulatory pressures and business objectives shape enforcement and policy mechanisms.
  • Metrics for effectiveness must match industry goals, user demographics, and compliance needs.
  • Emerging technologies like AI require industry-adapted solutions to stay effective.
  • Regional, language, and societal factors influence how solutions are selected and customized.
Note: The best solution aligns with both the business’s operational needs and the regulatory landscape of its industry.

Build or Buy

In-House Pros and Cons

Organizations often consider building their own Trust and Safety solutions to gain full control and customization. This approach allows teams to tailor every feature to their unique needs and policies. However, building in-house comes with significant challenges. The table below summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages:

Aspect

Building In-House Advantages

Building In-House Disadvantages

Customization

Full customization aligned with internal needs

High engineering and maintenance burden

Engineering Costs

Control over development

High engineering investment and ongoing maintenance

Operational Costs

Potentially tailored operations

High operational costs and complexity

Risk Management

Direct control over policies and enforcement

Risks related to capacity, sustainability, and tool reliability

Innovation

Potentially slower to adapt to new product needs

Legacy tools may lack flexibility

Accountability

Full responsibility for policies and enforcement

Full responsibility for policies and enforcement

Building in-house gives companies the ability to design solutions that fit their exact requirements. Teams can set their own priorities and adapt quickly to internal changes. However, this path demands a large investment in engineering and ongoing maintenance. Teams must manage high volumes of users and content, adapt to new communication channels, and minimize false positives in moderation. Insider threats also pose a serious risk, with nearly 60% of data breaches linked to insiders. These incidents can take months to resolve and often result in reputational damage and regulatory penalties. Companies must also address AI safety risks, data privacy, and compliance with evolving regulations.

Note: Building in-house means the company holds full responsibility for both the success and failure of its Trust and Safety program.

Vendor Pros and Cons

Many organizations choose to buy Trust and Safety solutions from specialized vendors. This approach offers several benefits, such as faster deployment and access to proven technology. Vendors provide pre-built security features, ongoing support, and operational efficiency. The table below highlights the main advantages and disadvantages of buying from a vendor:

Aspect

Buying Vendor Advantages

Buying Vendor Disadvantages

Customization

Pre-built, tested security features; vendor support

Limited customization

Engineering Costs

Reduces engineering load significantly

Some engineering needed for integration and deployment

Operational Costs

Operational efficiency, scalability, quick deployment

May require adaptation to vendor processes

Risk Management

Vendor support and tested tools reduce some risks

Vendor credibility and evaluation challenges

Innovation

Supports innovative efficiency and faster response

Dependence on vendor innovation pace

Accountability

Tools assist but company retains responsibility

Cannot outsource responsibility

Vendor solutions help companies reduce engineering and operational burdens. They allow teams to focus on core business activities and respond quickly to new threats. Vendors often bring specialized expertise and advanced technology, which can improve safety outcomes. However, organizations may face limits on customization and must adapt to vendor processes. Security risks, compliance challenges, and quality control issues can arise, especially if sensitive data is involved. Companies must also manage vendor relationships carefully to avoid hidden costs and integration problems.

Tip: Strong vendor management frameworks, detailed contracts, and regular risk assessments help mitigate many of the challenges of outsourcing.

When to Outsource

Outsourcing Trust and Safety functions has become a common strategy for both large enterprises and startups. Many tech companies, including major social media and gaming platforms, outsource parts of their Trust and Safety operations to business process outsourcers. This trend is driven by the need to reduce internal headcount, access specialized talent, and handle large volumes of labeling and moderation work.

Outsourcing offers several key benefits:

  • Cost savings and reduced overhead
  • Access to specialized expertise and on-demand talent
  • Improved operational capacity and flexibility
  • Ability to focus on core business goals
  • Risk mitigation by sharing labor and financial risks

However, outsourcing also introduces potential drawbacks:

  • Security risks, including data breaches and intellectual property theft
  • Compliance and legal challenges due to differing standards
  • Loss of control over daily operations and quality
  • Communication and cultural differences
  • Hidden costs and integration difficulties

To address these risks, organizations should:

  • Develop detailed contracts with clear expectations and service levels
  • Conduct thorough risk assessments and background checks
  • Use technology to monitor quality and maintain security
  • Establish strong vendor management and communication processes

The demand for outsourced Trust and Safety solutions continues to grow, especially as regulations like the EU Digital Services Act expand requirements for online platforms. Startups in the Trust and Safety software space now offer specialized tools and services to meet this demand. As internal teams shrink, companies increasingly rely on external partners to maintain safe and compliant digital environments.

Outsourcing is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Each organization must weigh its needs, resources, and risk tolerance before deciding to build, buy, or outsource Trust and Safety functions.

FAQ

What is the main difference between Trust and Safety and content moderation?

Trust and Safety covers a broad range of risks, including fraud, privacy, and user protection. Content moderation focuses only on removing harmful or inappropriate content. Trust and Safety uses both technology and human expertise to keep platforms secure.

How can a business measure the success of its Trust and Safety program?

A business can track metrics like user trust, incident response times, and compliance rates. Regular reviews help leaders see if the program meets goals. Improved customer satisfaction and fewer safety incidents show strong results.

When should a company consider outsourcing Trust and Safety functions?

A company should consider outsourcing when it needs specialized skills, wants to reduce costs, or faces high volumes of moderation work. Outsourcing helps businesses scale quickly and focus on core activities.

Are AI-powered Trust and Safety solutions reliable?

AI-powered solutions process large amounts of data quickly and spot patterns humans might miss. However, human oversight remains important. Combining AI with expert review gives the best results for accuracy and fairness.

Live Chat